The Progress Pride Flag Incites Racial Hatred

As a White man in Britain, I’m sick of it. That damn Progress Pride flag — with its arrogant chevron of black and brown stripes slapped onto the old rainbow — isn’t some harmless symbol of “inclusion.” It is a deliberate visual declaration that White people sit at the apex of the oppression Olympics, the ultimate villains in the intersectional hierarchy. And under British law, this kind of thing has form as incitement to racial hatred.

The Public Order Act 1986 (Part III) makes it an offence to use threatening, abusive or insulting words, behaviour or written material that is intended to stir up racial hatred, or where racial hatred is likely to be stirred up having regard to all the circumstances. Racial hatred means hatred against a group defined by colour, race, nationality or ethnic origins — and yes, that includes White people.

Back in 1967, Michael X (Michael Abdul Malik) became one of the first people convicted under the predecessor Race Relations Act for doing exactly that: stirring up hatred against Whites. In a speech in Reading, he raged about “white savages,” told his audience that if they saw a White man laying hands on a Black woman they should “kill him immediately,” and declared that “white men have no soul.” He was sentenced to 12 months in prison. The law has always been capable of protecting White people from racial incitement. It just rarely bothers to anymore.

Fast forward to today’s fashionable ideology. Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility lays it out plainly: Whiteness itself is the problem. Whites are socialised into racism from birth. Any pushback against this narrative — questioning it, feeling uncomfortable, or daring to say it’s unfair — is just more “fragility,” proof that you’re protecting your unearned supremacy. It’s a perfect Catch-22. Disagree with the race guilt trip? You’ve proven you’re guilty. Stay silent? You’re complicit. This isn’t analysis. It’s a racial shaming ritual aimed squarely at people like me.

Ibram X. Kendi takes it further. In his worldview, any disparity between racial groups is automatically the result of racism — specifically, White supremacy. The only remedy is “antiracist” discrimination: policies that actively disadvantage Whites and Asians to engineer equal outcomes. Colour-blindness? That’s racist too. Neutral standards? Racist. Merit? Racist. Everything that built successful societies is reframed as the toxic product of Whiteness that must be dismantled.

This poisonous framework is exactly what the Progress Pride flag celebrates and embeds. The original rainbow flag was about sexual orientation. The “progress” version, designed by Daniel Quasar and building on Philadelphia’s 2017 “More Color, More Pride” flag, deliberately adds black and brown stripes for “people of colour” (increasingly rebranded as the “global majority”) and trans colours. The chevron points forward, signalling that “progress” means elevating these groups by implicitly demoting the default — which, in Western countries, is coded as White.

By overlaying racial markers onto a once-universal symbol, the flag screams that ordinary White people are the privileged oppressors who must be corrected, decentred and made to step aside. It doesn’t say it with words, but the visual hierarchy does the job: Black and Brown first in the arrow of progress, Whiteness pushed into the background as the problem to be solved. That is insulting. That stirs resentment and racial division. As a White man, I experience it as hatred directed at my group — the same way Michael X’s words were rightly treated as incitement decades ago.

And they’re still ramming it down our throats with public money. Just look at Calderdale. In 2026, despite the new Reform-led council deciding not to fly the Progress Pride flag from civic buildings, campaigners went ahead anyway. Thirty banners featuring the flag appeared across the borough, complete with QR codes to report “hate crime,” at a cost of £8,000 funded by a public campaign. The council distanced itself, saying it didn’t approve them, but there they fly — publicly funded symbols telling White residents they are the apex oppressors in their own towns.

I hate that flag. It isn’t progress. It’s institutionalised anti-White racism dressed up as rainbow virtue. The law once recognised incitement against Whites. It’s long past time it did so again. Enough.